public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Atom feed
* Re: NNCP proxy for Internet mail providers?
@ 2021-10-28  3:46 Koushik Roy
  2021-10-28  5:33 ` tidux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Koushik Roy @ 2021-10-28  3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tidux; +Cc: nncp-devel

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 03:03:38 +0000, tidux@sdf•org wrote:
> I thought about that, but it's actually a lot harder than it appears at
> first glance.  You'd need something similar to isync/offlineimap to
> track the IMAP IDs of individual messages in the maildir on the client
> machine and then have a way of communicating, over NNCP, the changes
> that should cause server side mutations (message deleted, moved to new
> folder, etc.) back to the proxy host for translation into IMAP4 commands
> to relay to the Internet mail server.  Even then that behavior has to be
> a configuration toggle because sometimes you do just want the mailserver
> to archive everything forever even if your client mailbox gets hosed.

I'm curious, why not just cooperate with the local MDA? Is this
specifically to avoid having a local mail daemon altogether?

(Apologies if this mail gets mangled, I'm trying to switch away from
digest mode which is making it inconvenient to directly reply.)

- Koushik

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* NNCP proxy for Internet mail providers?
@ 2021-10-26 23:25 tidux
  2021-10-27  2:18 ` John Goerzen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: tidux @ 2021-10-26 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nncp-devel

Would anyone be interested in a daemon or set of daemons that sat
between a "normal" IMAP4+SMTP-submission remote access mail host and a
local sendmail/nncp/postfix setup?  I figure this use case is what's
missing for broad adoption of NNCP - self hosting Internet mail is
basically a non-starter for everyone in the US due to ISPs blackholing
port 25 and major webmail providers refusing to relay from residential
ISP ranges for spam reasons.  This also allows "chaining" of proxies for
providers that use non-standard protocols, like DavMail for Exchange, or
Hydroxide for ProtonMail.  For a single user the proxies should be
lightweight enough to run on a Raspberry Pi or cheap $5/mo VPS.

Yes, this is dumb and lame and suboptimal, but short of legal action
requiring that home user IPs be treated like full equal peers on the
Internet, it's the best way to use NNCP for mail without dealing with
the headaches of managing PKI, SPF/DKIM auth, spam filtering, etc. which
make managing public email servers a pain in the ass.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-28  7:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-28  3:46 NNCP proxy for Internet mail providers? Koushik Roy
2021-10-28  5:33 ` tidux
2021-10-28  7:47   ` Sergey Matveev
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-26 23:25 tidux
2021-10-27  2:18 ` John Goerzen
2021-10-27  2:39   ` John Goerzen
2021-10-27  3:03     ` tidux
2021-10-27  8:19   ` Sergey Matveev