public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Atom feed
From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete•org>
To: Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave•org>
Cc: nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Subject: Re: [EN] NNCP 8.1.0 release announcement
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:55:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o84axvhn.fsf@complete.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YeUUPVbDhfom2nA2@stargrave.org>


On Mon, Jan 17 2022, Sergey Matveev wrote:

> Greetings!
>
> *** John Goerzen [2022-01-16 19:19]:
>>I've read up on the doc page and I'm a little unclear on a few things:
>
> You right with all questions: indeed it is not so obvious and clear in
> documentation. Will definitely update it. Also I am looking to replace
> μTP transport protocol with pure TCP (implemented on pure Go) or
> something even simpler. It looks like unnecessary overhead. But I should
> investigate it deeper.

TCP would be really convenient!  It would also enable cooperation
between NNCP nodes that use the new integrated Yggdrasil code, and NNCP
nodes that have a standalone Yggdrasil node and simply listen on a port
that's available over Yggdrasil (as I already have been doing here).

I have been working to get the quux public relay available on Yggdrasil,
and being able to not have to say "this way for TCP with standlone, that
way for uTP with integrated" would be really nice.

If a change to TCP is imminent, perhaps I will hold off packaging and
uploading 8.1.0 to Debian so as to not introduce something that will
shortly be replaced over there.

>>- Does it support the Yggdrasil LAN multicast, and if so, can theq
>>interfaces it listens on for that be listed?
>
> By default no, but can be added quite easily, that I will do. I just
> ignored that feature for later times.
>
>>- If one does not want to have an open port for incoming peer
>>connections, can a person just omit the bindPublic and bindLocalhost?
>
> Currently no (without any reason :-)), but you are right that it is
> completely ordinary use-case. Will do it.
>
>>- Does the "optional list of allowed incoming connections" refer to
>>systems that are allowed to establish peering connections to the
>>embedded Yggdrasil node, or does it mean a list of systems that are
>>allowed to connect to NNCP over Yggdrasil?
>
> It is related only to Yggdrasil network, to its "AllowedPublicKeys"
> configuration option. Will make it more clear in documentation too.
>
>>- Either way, I'm unclear how to give that list of allowed incoming
>>connections.
>
> You can control (or allow any) only peer connections to the listener,
> with the option above. No ability to limit who can be answered to as
> NNCP service itself, except for removing noise* keys from configuration
> to forbid online protocol usage at all.

Got it, thanks!

- John

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-16 13:14 [EN] NNCP 8.1.0 release announcement Sergey Matveev
2022-01-17  1:19 ` John Goerzen
2022-01-17  7:01   ` Sergey Matveev
2022-01-17 14:55     ` John Goerzen [this message]
2022-01-17 15:08       ` Sergey Matveev
2022-01-17 20:23         ` John Goerzen
2022-01-17 21:07           ` Emery Hemingway
2022-01-18 22:13             ` Yggdrasil support Sergey Matveev
2022-01-18 22:01           ` Yggdrasil Sergey Matveev