public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Atom feed
From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete•org>
To: nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Subject: Re: I/O timeout in nncp-daemon
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:03:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtwtnlxq.fsf@complete.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YBJqdURTsVax8/X2@stargrave.org>
On Thu, Jan 28 2021, Sergey Matveev wrote:
>>Could it be doing the checksum inline while it's writing it to
>>disk in the
>>first place?
>
> Of course! But only if it gets the file from the very beginning.
> Or if
Ah, true. Perhaps in those cases, before reading the remaining
parts from the network, it would read in the existing bits? (Or
just do the check afterwards as it does now.)
I suppose that could lead to inefficiences if, say, it's getting a
1GB packet slowly and gets interrupted a bunch of times, but would
probably help in the general case?
> I will look at all of that subject (with checking files
> integrity
> asynchronously) when will find time.
>
> PS: please, do not add me as one of recipient of the email
> message -- I
> am already subscribed to the maillist, and my Mail-Followup-To
> header
> suggests that: https://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
Hmm. mu4e usually does the right thing, but in this case a basic
reply is sending it to you personally, and a "reply all" is
including you and the list on the reply. I will try to remember
to manually munge the headers on future replies. Sorry about
that.
- John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 23:55 I/O timeout in nncp-daemon John Goerzen
2021-01-23 9:28 ` Sergey Matveev
2021-01-27 22:48 ` John Goerzen
2021-01-28 7:40 ` Sergey Matveev
2021-01-28 15:03 ` John Goerzen [this message]
2021-01-28 15:25 ` Sergey Matveev