public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Atom feed
From: Koushik Roy <meff@meff•me>
To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete•org>,
Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave•org>
Cc: nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Subject: Re: Two Different Routes to the Same Node, One with Via
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:58:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735mxdm9l.fsf@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czm1k0k9.fsf@complete.org>
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete•org> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 12 2021, Sergey Matveev wrote:
>
>> Currently I assume that multicast can be used in the case you
>described.
I'll give this approach a shot. It sounds promising, and in my case
repeating a packet twice doesn't really matter that much as I'm sending
small packets anyway.
> Actually all that is needed to support Koushik's scenario perfectly
> would be a "max delivery" setting. Set it to 1, and after NNCP delivers
> a multicast packet to one destination, it would stop efforts to deliver
> it to any more.
>
This would be a cool feature, but how would you be able to enforce "max
delivery" across multiple neighbors?
- Koushik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 4:13 Two Different Routes to the Same Node, One with Via Koushik Roy
2021-12-12 17:33 ` Sergey Matveev
2021-12-12 20:52 ` John Goerzen
2021-12-13 6:58 ` Koushik Roy [this message]
2021-12-15 8:38 ` Sergey Matveev
2021-12-17 0:03 ` John Goerzen