public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Atom feed
From: Koushik Roy <meff@meff•me>
To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete•org>,
	Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave•org>
Cc: nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.ru
Subject: Re: Two Different Routes to the Same Node, One with Via
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:58:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735mxdm9l.fsf@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czm1k0k9.fsf@complete.org>

John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete•org> writes:

> On Sun, Dec 12 2021, Sergey Matveev wrote:
>
>> Currently I assume that multicast can be used in the case you
>described.

I'll give this approach a shot. It sounds promising, and in my case
repeating a packet twice doesn't really matter that much as I'm sending
small packets anyway.

> Actually all that is needed to support Koushik's scenario perfectly
> would be a "max delivery" setting.  Set it to 1, and after NNCP delivers
> a multicast packet to one destination, it would stop efforts to deliver
> it to any more.
>

This would be a cool feature, but how would you be able to enforce "max
delivery" across multiple neighbors?

- Koushik

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-10  4:13 Two Different Routes to the Same Node, One with Via Koushik Roy
2021-12-12 17:33 ` Sergey Matveev
2021-12-12 20:52   ` John Goerzen
2021-12-13  6:58     ` Koushik Roy [this message]
2021-12-15  8:38       ` Sergey Matveev
2021-12-17  0:03         ` John Goerzen